There is a Holocaust museum located
in Washington D.C. that I had the pleasure of visiting many years ago that took
me on a journey that I will never forget.
The journey through the museum is one much like the trip the Jews may
have gone on when they were going from camp to camp. At the camps people were kept in fenced in
areas, maybe not in cages like in Children of Men, but they were behind barbed
wire, starved, kept in close quarters and tortured. The lines of people waiting to be tortured
looked like the lines at the camps in Germany lining up for death marches, gas
chambers or waiting to be shot and killed.
The dead bodies in Children of Men were lined up in a similar fashion as
the ones who were tossed away in the Holocaust. They were laid body on top of limp body,
lying face down in the dirt, waiting to be buried or taken away to a mass gravesite. We do not see what happens to the people in
the Children of Men, but as the bus passes each section, we see a story line of
what their future holds for them here.
Torture, physical and humiliating torture followed by waiting and
watching of other fellow immigrants. Finally,
as the bus pulls away, you see the lines of bodies waiting to be taken
away. This sequence is short, much like
their lives are, much the lives in the whole movie are.
Both groups of people, the Jews and
the immigrants of Children of Men are suffering, immensely. The Jews were taken from their homelands and
dragged into a cramped shelter where they waited to die. In Children of Men, we find foreigners
searching for a new home and are rejected by the government in the most
forceful way possible, forced into cages like wild beasts. In during the time of the Holocaust, the
world was fighting the Germans to free the Jews, but in Children of Men there
is no one fighting for the freedom of the foreigners. You see no protest against what they are
doing other than the continuation of people flooding into Britain for safety
even though they know their punishment could mean their life.
Did we not learn anything from this
the first time? We are shown that only
one race and nationality is accepted, the British. Though they do not all have to have blue eyes
and blonde hair, people with different skin color or speak another language are
easily spotted and taken away. This
truly is no different. The reasoning to
exterminate different races is much different; in contrast, they are getting
rid of people do to over population not due to the dislike of what they look
like. But the outcome is the same. Killing people for their background and
heritage because it is not like their own.
So in answer to my question, no we have no learned from our mistakes,
instead we are repeating them just applying them to different situations and
difficulties. It is repulsive and upsetting to think that
this is what the director and screenwriter believe this is what our future is
going to look like. Taking all of our
horrible memories of the past, and reenacting them in one final push for some
kind of human resistance.
I, as well, thought I was watching the Holocaust play out while watching this film. After going to the museum in DC myself, I found that I have never been able to get the images out of my head of what took place at the concentration camps. I also felt as if the director brought this to life again through the movie. However, I do not think this was necessarily his opinion about what the future would be like. I think the disturbing images were meant more as an additional conflict for the characters to bypass. Just as well, the director and screenwriter probably wanted this reaction from the viewers, which means the artistic use of the Holocaust scenes did their job.
ReplyDeleteI definitely also saw the impact of the Holocaust on this film. In addition, I noticed the similarities to the Berlin Wall and the division of a city in many of the scenes, especially around the trains. I feel like the director played on the Holocaust because it was so catastrophic in human history and is regarded as something that could never happen again, and it's interesting that they portrayed it as happening so easily and so widespread.
ReplyDelete