The idea
that the humans created beings identical to us in order to accomplish
slave-like tasks is both understanding and repulsive. The idea of putting in memories to trick them
into thinking that they were actually beings and then shortening their lifespan
so they could never become a threat to us is almost inconceivable. But one could never place a mental
consciousness into another inanimate object; we are born with consciousness, so
how could we give consciousness to a robot that was chemical engineered? If we some how found a way in which we could
learn to accomplish this, would giving consciousness to fake beings something
that would be beneficial or harmful?
Would our value of our own consciousness stay the same or decrease the
value of human life?
Looking at
the perspective of the director, human life versus artificial life was not the
same. On a superficial level, the Replicants
and the humans were treated the same.
They could live together, dress the same, participate and no one would be
able to tell the difference, unless they took the test. On the other hand, the fact that Replicants’
didn’t have the ability to have and form old memories took the most human thing
away from them. Remembering old fads,
clothing styles, people, relationships, etc. make you the person you are. Instead they were controllable, manufactured
creatures which was the intended goal.
But my question is, since they had consciousness, were they still
somewhat human? Even though they did not
come from another human being directly, but rather grown, do they still not
deserve the same treatment as other human beings?
Two
positions could be taken. One side is
that the Replicants are merely robots and controllable. If the Replicants are controllable and not
born true humans, then they do not deserve the same respect of life as true
humans do. Therefore the Replicants do
not deserve true respect of their lives.
But if technology could have somehow given them consciousness, shouldn’t
humans give Replicants more thought to their life and give them respect? If we have consciousness and deserve respect
of our lives then don’t the Replicants as well?
I think one of the major themes behind movies like Blade Runner, besides a director's vision or entertainment value, is to flesh out the issue you focused on: giving nonhuman entities very human qualities. I find it hard to decide on a single position on how to treat things like Replicants. It is true that they show signs of consciousness, but is this a semblance of what humans have, or the real thing? I think when it comes to man made creations, the bottom line for many is that they are that- man made, and if humanity has to be given to something, it is not a right.
ReplyDeleteRoy's desire for more life should be evidence enough that the replicants have their own feelings. If you have no conscious of your own than you would desire nothing, unless told to desire it. Obviously the replicants are not being told to desire more life since they are purposely given such a short life span. I believe that in the case of Blade Runner, it is clear that the replicants have their own feelings and conscious, therefore they should be treated with the same rights as humans.
ReplyDelete